🔒 Investor data room & restricted legal documents available after sign-in
🔐 Investor Sign-in ✉️ Request Access
EU AI Act: self-classified limited risk

A "Compliance First" AI climate platform,
with the evidence status of every claim.

EU AI Act self-classification documented. Article 12 logging as a design target. Human-in-the-loop by design. Every compliance claim is transparent, auditable, and available for your legal team to verify.

Read the Full Assessment View Sovereignty Options

Lifetime Legal & Compliance Hub

Transparency as a Service.

At Lifetime Oy, we believe that legal clarity is the foundation of industrial trust. Our "Compliance First" architecture is designed to turn complex EU regulations—such as Fit for 55, the EU AI Act, the Digital Services Act (DSA), the EU Data Act, and GDPR—from liabilities into competitive assets for our clients.

Below you will find our complete legal framework, governing our software, services, and commercial relationships. Each policy carries an explicit effective date, last review, and named escalation channel to simplify vendor-risk assessments.

0. Compliance at a Glance

This overview summarises the key legal and compliance controls for Lifetime Oy (Lifetime Oy, Finland & DWS IQ OÜ, Estonia), DWS IQ 7 Aegis (primary product) and its predecessor DWS IQ 6 (installed base), the Firehorse product line, Lifetime Consulting & Advisory services, and Lifetime Studios services.

Policy Applies to Effective Last reviewed
🛡️ Digital Sovereignty All EU deployments 28 Jan 2026 01 Apr 2026
EU SEAL-0 … SEAL-4 Vocabulary — Commission Cloud Sovereignty Framework. Not a DWS certificate. Oct 2025 14 Sep 2026
⭐ Privacy Policy & GDPR Statement All visitors & data subjects 01 Jan 2023 01 Apr 2026
⭐ Data Security Policy All business partners & clients 13 Dec 2025 01 Apr 2026
⭐ Data Handling Policy Internal team & partners 13 Dec 2025 01 Apr 2026
⭐ Agreement & Project Terms Enterprise & project clients 15 May 2024 01 Apr 2026
⭐ DWS IQ Terms of Service DWS IQ SaaS users 30 Jun 2024 01 Apr 2026
⭐ Firehorse Terms of Service Marketing & reporting automation users 02 Sep 2024 01 Apr 2026
⭐ Lifetime Fleet Terms Robotics, drone & logistics partners 12 Feb 2025 01 Apr 2026
⭐ Professional Services Terms Consulting & advisory engagements 20 Mar 2024 01 Apr 2026
⭐ Regulatory Notice for Investors Prospective & current investors 18 Oct 2024 01 Apr 2026
⭐ Return & Performance Policy Store & subscription customers 05 Jan 2024 01 Apr 2026
⭐ Lifetime Oy Legal Notices 2026 Lifetime Oy corporate & group entities 01 Dec 2025 01 Apr 2026
Data Processing Agreement (DPA) All customers processing Personal Data via DWS IQ 05 Feb 2026 01 Apr 2026
KYA Specification v1.5 — Know Your Agent BYO agent governance, sandbox isolation, DWS IQ 09 Mar 2026 01 Apr 2026
AI Safety Report 2026 Analysis Security Research — all AI deployments 06 Feb 2026 01 Apr 2026
Security & Trust Security architecture, pentest program, responsible disclosure 18 Mar 2026 01 Apr 2026

Dates show when each control entered into force and the most recent audit or legal review. Earlier versions remain available upon request.


1. EU AI Act Self-Classification

Lifetime Oy maintains formal documentation of DWS IQ 6's classification under the EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689), enforceable from 2 August 2026.

Classification: Limited-Risk AI System EU AI Act 2024/1689

DWS IQ 6 and Firehorse modules are self-assessed as not high-risk under Article 6 and Annex III, and as not prohibited practices under Article 5. The transparency duties of Article 50 apply to them (“limited risk”). Annex III covers, among others, biometrics, employment decisions, law enforcement and safety components of critical infrastructure; a deployer’s own use can bring a deployment into scope (see Customer Risk Disclosures).

DWS IQ 7 Aegis is classified per deployment against Annex III before go-live; the self-classification above covers the DWS IQ platform as described.

Primary function: automating ESG data into auditable compliance dashboards and 2030 simulation models — a decision-support tool, not an autonomous safety-critical actuator.

Documented Compliance Elements

EU AI Act Requirement Our Implementation Status
Technical Documentation (Art. 11) Full system cards, model documentation, and architecture specs maintained in internal governance repository ✅ Active
Record-Keeping & Logging (Art. 12) Automatic logging of AI events, designed to the Article 12 logging requirement; 7-year retention; SIEM export available. Article 12 belongs to the high-risk obligations, scheduled to apply from 2 December 2027 (Annex III) and 2 August 2028 (Annex I) under the Digital Omnibus on AI, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (in force 27 July 2026). This is a design target, not a statement that any customer is compliant today. 🎯 Design target
Reasoning Lineage / Explainability Every AI decision includes a traceable input → output chain; provenance metadata embedded in all AI-generated reports ✅ Active
Human-in-the-Loop Oversight No autonomous safety-critical actions; human validation required before any actuation or compliance filing ✅ By design
AI Governance Framework Internal risk assessment, incident audit trails, autonomy tiers (1–5), and quarterly internal review ✅ Active
Data Sovereignty & GDPR Art. 6 Private-cloud deployment; EU data residency (FI/DE); all processing bases documented per GDPR Article 6 ✅ Active
Transparency Obligations (Art. 50) Users are disclosed when interacting with AI-generated compliance reports or automated content. Art. 50(4), from 2 August 2026: machine-translated or AI-created public text carries an AI notice unless a named person reviewed it substantively, had authority to amend it, and is publicly reachable; editorial responsibility is recorded per post. ✅ Active
NIS2 Readiness Incident reporting architecture: early warning to Traficom within 24 hours, incident notification within 72 hours, final report within one month (NIS2 Art. 23(4)). Amendment proposal COM(2026) 13 is not yet adopted; current obligations are unchanged. ✅ Aligned
Third-Party Conformity Assessment Not required for limited-risk classification; ISO 27001 audit planned — no date confirmed 🔄 Roadmap
Deadline readiness: Our self-assessment covers the limited-risk obligations that apply from 2 August 2026. Preparatory elements for potential future reclassification — risk management controls, human oversight architecture, and full audit trails — are embedded in the product from day one.

Regulatory Timeline

Date Milestone
2 Feb 2025 EU AI Act — prohibited practices (Article 5) and the AI literacy obligation (Article 4) apply
2 Aug 2025 EU AI Act — general-purpose AI model obligations apply
Aug 2026 EU AI Act general date of application; Art. 50 transparency obligations apply — Article 99 penalty regime active (up to €15M or 3% of global turnover for deployer violations under Art. 99(4); €35M or 7% for prohibited practices under Art. 5)
2 Dec 2027 / 2 Aug 2028 High-risk obligations (incl. Article 12 logging) for Annex III / Annex I systems — dates set by the Digital Omnibus on AI, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (in force 27 July 2026)
9 Dec 2026 Transposition deadline of the revised Product Liability Directive (EU) 2024/2853, which extends strict product liability to software and AI systems (Finland: Product Liability Act 694/1990 amendment pending in Parliament)
11 Dec 2027 Cyber Resilience Act (EU) 2024/2847 — CE marking and main obligations for products with digital elements apply

2. Digital Sovereignty

Sovereignty is the primary segmentation axis — not the only one. Jurisdiction is the first cut. Industry, price and capability still matter after it. 🛡️ EU-Sovereign by Design

The Commission’s Cloud Sovereignty Framework (v1.2.1) scores offers SEAL-0 … SEAL-4. SEAL is a gate (weakest of eight SOV objectives). Cloud III’s floor was SEAL-2. DWS was not in that tender and does not hold a SEAL certificate. The table is literacy, not a badge.

SEAL Official name (v1.2.1) In practice
0 No Sovereignty Exclusive non-EU control. US/CN public cloud.
1 Jurisdictional Sovereignty EU law on paper. An EU region on a US parent.
2 Data Sovereignty EU law enforceable. Cloud III minimum. Material non-EU deps remain.
3 Digital Resilience Cannot be cut by a non-EU supplier. OVH / STACKIT / Scaleway class.
4 Full Digital Sovereignty Chips-to-software. Commission: not realistic today (hardware dependence).

Indicative DWS depths: Aegis / Sovereign Infra (J1, EU sales) aim at SEAL-2…3 on an EU-owned stack. Connect (C) is non-EU sales (J2/J3) ≈ SEAL-0/1. NVIDIA GN100/DGX keeps SEAL-4 closed.

EU AI Act: High-risk AI systems require EU data governance. DWS IQ 7 Aegis is designed to meet the Article 12 logging requirement with reasoning lineage documentation — a design target, not a statement that any customer is compliant today. High-risk obligations are scheduled from 2 December 2027 (Annex III) and 2 August 2028 (Annex I) under the Digital Omnibus on AI, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744.

3. Privacy & Data Governance

Data Portability & Sovereignty: Industrial telemetry can be exported in NDJSON/Parquet format. EU-based customers default to Helsinki or Frankfurt regions.

4. Digital Services & Platform Accountability


5. Commercial Agreements


6. Product Terms of Service


7. Investor Relations

The regulatory notice for investors, the SAFE terms and the risk factors are available to qualified investors in our data room after sign-in. We do not offer securities to the public on this website. Request access or write to invest@lifetime.fi.


8. Return & Performance Policy


9. Security Research

Independent research and analysis on AI safety, cybersecurity, and enterprise risk management informing our platform security posture and compliance architecture.

Security Research Policy: DWS IQ Platform security architecture is informed by continuous monitoring of international AI safety research, OWASP guidelines, and EU regulatory developments. Research summaries are published as field notes and, when validated, elevated to core compliance artifacts.

10. Security & Trust

Security is not a feature — it is the foundation of every DWS IQ deployment. Our security architecture is designed for EU-regulated industries where agent failures have legal, financial, and safety consequences.

Security Architecture

Layer Technology Purpose
Agent Identity KYA Specification (Know Your Agent) Cryptographic agent identity, capability gating, fault attribution
Behavioral Guardrails Leash Snap Protocol (design target < 5 ms) Pre-execution controls enforced before every agent action
Trust Scoring Agent Trust Score (ATS 0–100) Real-time agent reliability scoring with automatic suspension
Forensic Audit Firehorse Suite Immutable audit trails, reasoning lineage, 7-year retention
Tool Isolation MCP Colors Framework (RED/BLUE) Destructive and read-only tools separated to prevent prompt injection escalation
Encryption AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.3 in transit All data encrypted in storage and during transmission
Data Residency EU-only in the Aegis tier (Finland) No US-parent CLOUD Act path when the EU-owned Aegis stack is chosen. Other tiers use US-parent providers in EU regions and two US AI providers under SCC (see the sub-processor list).

Three Evidence Layers for D&O Safe Harbor

D&O insurers require documented governance that proves “reasonable measures” were in place before an AI agent acted. The KYA Specification produces three independent layers of evidence, each mapped to a distinct liability question:

  1. Identity Attribution. Proves which agent produced the output — not “our AI.” Every agent carries a cryptographic identity bound to its deployment context, which isolates director decisions from agent failures.
  2. Fault Attribution. Separates LOGIC_FAULT (agent error) from OPERATOR_FAULT (human misconfiguration) from MANIFEST_FAULT (deployment issue). Demonstrates that the board’s governance framework was adequate even when an individual agent fails.
  3. Behavioral Guardrails. Pre-execution controls were active before the agent acted, enforced by the Leash Snap Protocol (design target < 5 ms per decision; no measurement report published yet). This is the evidence a board needs to show it took reasonable measures; whether it limits personal liability depends on national law and the insurer.

Continuous Security Testing

AI-Specific Security (OWASP LLM Top 10)

Certifications & Compliance Roadmap

Standard Status Target Date
GDPR Privacy policy, DPA and sub-processor list in force Since 2023
NIS2 Aligned Active — 24h early warning to Traficom
EU AI Act Self-classified as limited risk under the EU AI Act Article 12 logging: design target; high-risk obligations apply from 2 Dec 2027 / 2 Aug 2028 (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744)
KYA Specification v1.5 Production-Ready Q2 2026 launch
ISO 27001 Planned — no date confirmed —
ISO/IEC 42001 (AI Management System) Preparing AI governance & data protection management roadmap
SOC 2 Type II Planned — no date confirmed —

Responsible Disclosure

We welcome security researchers who identify vulnerabilities in our platform. Please report findings responsibly:

See our security.txt (RFC 9116) for machine-readable security contact information, and the full Vulnerability Disclosure Policy for scope, guidelines, and what to expect from us.

Trust Center: For a visual overview of our security controls and certification status, visit the DWS IQ Trust Center. For KYA governance framework details (agent identity, D&O safe harbor, performance guarantees), see the Board Governance & D&O Safe Harbor below.

11. Customer Risk Disclosures

Lifetime Oy provides the following disclosures in the interest of full transparency. We encourage prospective customers, deployers, and investors to review these with their own legal and compliance teams before integration.

EU AI Act — Deployer Responsibility

Our limited-risk self-classification applies to DWS IQ 6 as designed and deployed by Lifetime Oy. DWS IQ 7 Aegis is classified per deployment against Annex III before go-live; the self-classification above covers the DWS IQ platform as described. Under Article 26 of the EU AI Act, deployers bear independent responsibility for their own use-case risk assessment. If you integrate DWS IQ 6 into operations that may constitute safety-critical infrastructure under Annex III — for example, energy grid control, transport critical infrastructure, or employment-decision systems — a higher-risk classification may apply to your specific deployment, regardless of our provider-level classification.

We have designed DWS IQ 6 with preparatory controls (human oversight, audit trails, risk management tiers) that ease any such reclassification. Contact compliance@lifetime.fi to discuss your specific integration scenario before go-live.

Product Maturity & Early Commercial Stage

DWS IQ 6 v1.0 launched on 23 February 2026 and is in an active pilot and early commercial phase. Its successor, DWS IQ 7 Aegis, is the primary product; general availability is planned for Q1 2027, after the first pilot acceptance record — a plan, not a committed date. Real-world regulatory enforcement of AI Act claims across EU markets will mature after the August 2026 deadline. Enterprise customers should allow for a standard evaluation period. Our SLA (99.5% baseline uptime) and return policy protect your deployment commitment during this phase.

Third-Party Audit Status

As a limited-risk AI system, no notified-body review or CE marking is required or planned. ISO 27001 certification is planned — no date confirmed. Internal automated penetration testing (OWASP Top 10 + LLM Top 10) was established Q1 2026 and runs continuously. An annual external third-party pentest is planned — no date confirmed (report will be available under NDA upon request). No independent AI conformity assessment has been conducted to date — this is consistent with the limited-risk regime.

Regulatory Interpretation Risk

EU AI Act interpretation — particularly for Annex III point 2 (critical infrastructure) and cross-sector industrial AI — is still evolving as the EU AI Office publishes implementation guidance. Lifetime Oy monitors EU AI Office communications and updates its compliance position accordingly. Our governance framework is designed to accommodate regulatory clarifications without architectural rework.

DPIA Recommendation: If you are evaluating DWS IQ 6 for regulated or safety-sensitive operations, we recommend conducting a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) for your specific use case. Request our AI Safety & Legal Pack (technical docs, AI governance framework summary, DPA template) at compliance@lifetime.fi.

12. Contact & Escalation

Data Protection Contact

No statutory DPO (GDPR Art. 37)
privacy@lifetime.fi
Requests processed within 30 days.

Legal & DPA Desk

legal@lifetime.fi
Contract redlines, SCC questions, notice-and-action.

Security / NIS2 Incidents

security@lifetime.fi
Monitored mailbox; acknowledgement within 48 hours.

Lifetime Oy (Finland)

Y-tunnus: 0772407-9
VAT: FI07724079
Laidunmaanraitti 2 A 25
02330 Espoo, Finland
risto.paarni@lifetime.fi
+358 400 319 010

DWS IQ OÜ (Estonia)

DWS IQ Platform provider
Established Q2 2026
Subsidiary of Lifetime Oy

Partner Ecosystem

Digia Hub partner company
NVIDIA programme · Microsoft Founders Hub L1–L4
EU-sovereign delivery partners


13. Board Governance & D&O Safe Harbor

KYA (Know Your Agent) is the governance framework that produces the evidence boards, courts and insurers ask for about autonomous AI agents. It does not by itself make a deployment EU AI Act compliant. It is designed for boards and directors who approve agentic AI deployments in EU-regulated industries.

Board-level exposure. EU AI Act Article 99(4) carries fines up to €15M or 3% of annual global turnover for breaches of operator obligations, including deployer duties (Article 26) and transparency duties (Article 50). Prohibited-practice violations under Article 5 reach €35M or 7%. National corporate governance codes add personal exposure for directors who approved AI deployments without documented controls.

KYA Framework: Two Standards

Full specification: KYA Specification v1.5.

D&O Insurance Impact

Metric Value Basis
Indicative D&O Premium Reduction Not quantified No insurer has confirmed a premium reduction for KYA. Ask your broker how documented AI governance affects your cover.
Addressable Enterprises Every KYA-certified deployer EU AI Act applies to all deployers, not just providers (Art. 26)
Commercial Model Included in platform fee D&O savings are a sales accelerator, not a separate SKU

Fines, premiums, and legal defence remain with the customer. KYA produces the Article 12 logging and Article 26 deployer evidence insurers require; it does not underwrite liability.


14. EU-Regulated Industries Coverage

DWS IQ 6 is designed for autonomous-agent governance across the industries most exposed to Fit for 55, CBAM, ETS, CSRD, and the EU AI Act. Coverage is organised in three regulatory-exposure tiers:

Tier Industries Primary Exposure
Tier 1 — Critical Emissions Power & Heat, Iron & Steel, Cement & Lime, Chemicals, Aviation, Maritime, Road Transport, Construction EU ETS, CBAM, Fit for 55
Tier 2 — Important Emissions Agriculture, Waste Management, Aluminium, Pulp & Paper, Petroleum Refining, Food & Beverage, Glass & Ceramics, Mining CSRD, sector emission benchmarks, EU ETS extension
Tier 3 — Wedge Industries Fintech & Trading, Pharma & Biotech, Cybersecurity, Healthcare & MedTech DORA, NIS2, EU AI Act high-risk categories (Annex III)

Industry list maintained in sync with the EU ETS Phase 4 scope, CBAM Regulation 2023/956 Annex I, and CSRD sector-specific ESRS. Contact compliance@lifetime.fi for the current industry-specific controls matrix.